Investment trust bargain hunter: three ‘cheap’ specialist trusts on wide discounts

Investment trust bargain hunter

Markets have enjoyed a fine run since the Brexit vote last June, so bargains are scarce. But these three trusts are trading on wide discounts.

On the whole, smaller company investment trusts have recovered their poise since being initially rocked by the outcome of last year’s referendum vote. In the first six months of 2016, widening discounts turned an average 8 per cent fall in their net asset values (NAV) per share into an average 17 per cent fall in share prices.

The Brexit vote hit the sector hard, with money flowing out of domestically orientated stocks, on the assumption that these types of businesses would be more vulnerable to an economic slowdown.
This, however, has so far failed to materialise, although there are some signs that the second half of 2017 will become a more testing time for the economy

As things have turned out, those savvy investors who entered the smaller company trust sector in the post-Brexit panic will today be patting themselves on the back, as the average trust has posted a NAV increase of 29.8 per cent over the past year.

But in certain cases share price returns have failed to keep up with NAV performance, which is an indication that investors have remained cautious and have not been piling into the sector.
Indeed, given that the Brexit negotiations have only just commenced, investor caution towards the sector is understandable, and as a result UK domestic stocks look relatively cheap in terms of valuations

For investment trust fans with a long-term mindset, however, there are bargains aplenty to take advantage of across the UK smaller company trust sector. As previously tipped in this column, Woodford Patient Capital’s current 7.9 per cent discount still catches the eye, but there are two other trusts that are potentially bigger bargains at this juncture.   

Research by Stifel, the stockbroker, looked at how investment trust discounts today compare with their six-month averages, in order to size up value in the discount.  The table below highlights the 10 ‘widest discounts’ on this metric; as it shows, there are two smaller company specialist trusts that are ranked higher than Woodford Patient Capital – Herald and Invesco Perpetual UK Smaller Companies.

Herald, which specialises in companies investing in technology, media and communications, is on a 21 per cent discount, compared with a six-month range between 22 and 17 per cent, while Invesco Perpetual UK Smaller Companies is offering a 7 per cent discount, which is towards the high end of its six-month range of 8 to 2 per cent.

In the case of Woodford Patient Capital, the 7.9 per cent discount, compared to a six-month range between 10 and 1 per cent, is a reflection of ‘relatively weak NAV performance since IPO,’ according to Stifel.

On the whole Woodford investors are keeping the faith, however. They include stockbroker Killik, who in a note to clients this week reaffirmed its commitment. ‘There continue to be signs of significant progress being made from many of the underlying holdings and therefore we continue to view the long-term return prospects for this portfolio as compelling,’ the firm said.

Wide discount table

RankTrustCurrent discountSix month range (%)
1Mid Wynd4.14.1 to 4.8 premium
2NB Global Floating Rate Income2.42.5 to 2.7 premium
3Herald Investment Trust21.122.1 to 17.1
4Invesco Perpetual UK Smaller Companies7.37.8 to 2.2
5Polar Capital Global Financials77 to 2.8 premium
6Majedie9.210.5 to 0.1  
7Templeton Emerging Markets13.513.8 to 10.9
8Woodford Patient Capital7.910.1 to 0.8
9Invesco Asia Trust12.213.1 to 8.6
10BlackRock North American Income8.18.4 to 2.4 premium

WHY SMALL IS BEAUTIFUL

One of the most powerful long-term investment trends is the outperformance of small shares versus large.

Over the past 60 years smaller companies have shone. Research in 2015 by the London Business School found that investing £1 in 1955 in the Numis 1000 index, composed of the smallest UK-listed companies, would have produced £12,144 by the end of 2015.

The same £1 invested in the FTSE All-Share would have grown to just £829.

Over 10-year periods since 1955, smaller firms outperformed larger companies five times out of six.


Subscribe to Money Observer magazine

 

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.